<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What part offends you most about the Sotomayor cartoon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://progressontheprairie.com/2009/06/12/what-part-offends-you-most-about-the-sotomayor-cartoon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://progressontheprairie.com/2009/06/12/what-part-offends-you-most-about-the-sotomayor-cartoon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spring</title>
		<link>http://progressontheprairie.com/2009/06/12/what-part-offends-you-most-about-the-sotomayor-cartoon/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressontheprairie.com/?p=666#comment-657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe, thanks for visiting my blog, hun! I totally agree that it is a complex and ambiguous cartoon. Which is why I think there could be really interesting conversation built around it. I think your point that &quot;taking a swing is [to] be political suicide&quot; is very interesting. I agree that that is part of what Bok is trying to say, and I think it&#039;s disgusting that grown adults can&#039;t have fervent debate without feeling like they are being pigeon-holed or committing political suicide.
Still, it&#039;s so cheap and easy to go to a person&#039;s race and gender for cartoon fodder when they are a non-white male.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, thanks for visiting my blog, hun! I totally agree that it is a complex and ambiguous cartoon. Which is why I think there could be really interesting conversation built around it. I think your point that &#8220;taking a swing is [to] be political suicide&#8221; is very interesting. I agree that that is part of what Bok is trying to say, and I think it&#8217;s disgusting that grown adults can&#8217;t have fervent debate without feeling like they are being pigeon-holed or committing political suicide.<br />
Still, it&#8217;s so cheap and easy to go to a person&#8217;s race and gender for cartoon fodder when they are a non-white male.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://progressontheprairie.com/2009/06/12/what-part-offends-you-most-about-the-sotomayor-cartoon/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressontheprairie.com/?p=666#comment-654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to submit that while the image is ugly and the iconography is racist and misogynist, the argument that is being presented is actually fairly complex and ambiguous for a cartoon.  It seems that the cartoonist is trying to use tools too rough to make too fine a point.

One of the above questions, at least, has a pretty easy answer that begins to get to the point of the cartoon. Sotomayor is smiling because there will not be a beating as the whole situation is a standoff, not a party. Taking a swing is be political suicide. The position of weakness is reversed and shown to be a position of power. 

There is plenty to take issue with beside this. One can construct arguments that will be offensive at the expense of the ones one is arguing on behalf of (shows like Southpark do this quite often). The cartoon is still problematic, but not in the ways (or in more complex ways) that it seems most people are taking it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to submit that while the image is ugly and the iconography is racist and misogynist, the argument that is being presented is actually fairly complex and ambiguous for a cartoon.  It seems that the cartoonist is trying to use tools too rough to make too fine a point.</p>
<p>One of the above questions, at least, has a pretty easy answer that begins to get to the point of the cartoon. Sotomayor is smiling because there will not be a beating as the whole situation is a standoff, not a party. Taking a swing is be political suicide. The position of weakness is reversed and shown to be a position of power. </p>
<p>There is plenty to take issue with beside this. One can construct arguments that will be offensive at the expense of the ones one is arguing on behalf of (shows like Southpark do this quite often). The cartoon is still problematic, but not in the ways (or in more complex ways) that it seems most people are taking it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://progressontheprairie.com/2009/06/12/what-part-offends-you-most-about-the-sotomayor-cartoon/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressontheprairie.com/?p=666#comment-653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Spring-a-ding!! I just wanted to let you know that I gave Progress on the Prairie an award on my blog! 
Love ya,
Tara]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Spring-a-ding!! I just wanted to let you know that I gave Progress on the Prairie an award on my blog!<br />
Love ya,<br />
Tara</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beamish</title>
		<link>http://progressontheprairie.com/2009/06/12/what-part-offends-you-most-about-the-sotomayor-cartoon/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beamish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://progressontheprairie.com/?p=666#comment-651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GROSS!  how patently lame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GROSS!  how patently lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

